Opel Meriva 2005 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 180 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 280 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 17.8 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.9 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
Opel Meriva petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, a Opel Meriva with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
Opel Meriva is smaller. Opel Meriva is 24 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Meriva is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1410 litres | no data | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Opel Meriva has 190 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Meriva is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Opel Meriva can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`850 | ~ 1`267 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Meriva has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |