Opel Corsa 1990 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995

 
Opel Corsa
1990 - 1993
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 60 HP60 HP
Torque: 103 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds14.9 seconds
Opel Corsa and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Opel Corsa torque is 13 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Opel Corsa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.9 l/100km
By specification Opel Corsa consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Corsa could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Corsa consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway880 km on highway
580 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years4 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 3.65 m3.72 m
Width: 1.54 m1.66 m
Height: 1.36 m1.42 m
Opel Corsa is smaller.
Opel Corsa is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Corsa is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1060 litres975 litres
Opel Corsa has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Opel Corsa has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 85 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Opel Corsa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2501`400
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Opel Corsa has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv