Opel Corsa 2000 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Corsa is more dynamic to drive. Opel Corsa engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Opel Corsa reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Corsa consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Corsa could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Corsa consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Corsa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Corsa engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Agila | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Arosa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Lupo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Opel Corsa is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Corsa is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Corsa is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Corsa has more luggage capacity. Opel Corsa has 130 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Corsa has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |