Opel Corsa 2006 vs Renault Clio 2009

 
Opel Corsa
2006 - 2010
Renault Clio
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.5 Diesel
Petrol engines (Opel Corsa) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Clio) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 80 HP85 HP
Torque: 110 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds12.7 seconds
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Corsa engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Opel Corsa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.84.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Corsa consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Corsa could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Corsa consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle1170 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1240 km on highway
670 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 5 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel AgilaInstalled on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Opel Corsa engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ...  More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.03 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.49 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Corsa is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 285 litres288 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1100 litresno data
Opel Corsa has 3 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5551`655
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Opel Corsa has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Opel Corsa, so Opel Corsa quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18002600
Pros and Cons: Opel Corsa has
  • timing chain engine
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Renault Clio has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv