Opel Corsa 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Corsa
1993 - 1997
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.71.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 45 - 109 HP68 - 140 HP
Torque: 88 - 150 NM108 - 167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 20 seconds7.6 - 16.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.56.1 - 7.9
On average, the Opel Corsa petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Opel Corsa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.73 m4.28 m
Width: 1.61 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Opel Corsa is smaller, but slightly higher.
Opel Corsa is 55 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Corsa is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1050 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`407~ 1`019
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Opel Corsa has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv