Opel Corsa 2000 vs Mazda 2 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Corsa
2000 - 2003
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.81.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 58 - 125 HP68 - 100 HP
Torque: 85 - 170 NM110 - 160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 17 seconds11.4 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 7.94.5 - 7.1
Opel Corsa petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Opel Corsa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.82 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.44 m1.54 m
Opel Corsa is smaller.
Opel Corsa is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Corsa is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1060 litres1044 litres
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight: ~ 1`482 kg~ 1`512 kg
Net weight:~ 965 kg~ 1`070 kg
Load capacity:~ 517 kg~ 442 kg
Opel Corsa load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Mazda 2. Therefore, Opel Corsa is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Opel Corsa has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv