Opel Corsa 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Corsa
2003 - 2006
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.81.1 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 60 - 125 HP60 - 110 HP
Torque: 88 - 240 NM93 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 18 seconds9.6 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 7.94.2 - 7.4
Opel Corsa petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Opel Corsa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.84 m3.81 m
Width: 1.65 m1.64 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Corsa is 3 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Corsa is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1060 litres1037 litres
Opel Corsa has 5 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 23 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Opel Corsa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`471~ 1`501
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Opel Corsa has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv