Opel Corsa 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 100 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 170 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.2 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 5.9 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Opel Corsa petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Opel Corsa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Corsa is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 952 litres | |
| Opel Corsa has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 148 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Opel Corsa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`572 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Corsa has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |