Opel Calibra 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Opel Calibra engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Calibra is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Calibra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Opel Calibra has 20 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. This could mean that the Opel Calibra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Calibra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Opel Calibra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Calibra has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |