Opel Calibra 1992 vs Ford Sierra 1987
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Opel Calibra engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Ford Sierra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Calibra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.41 m | |
| Opel Calibra is 2 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Calibra is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Calibra is 1.5 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Opel Calibra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Calibra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |