Opel Calibra 1990 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 204 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 280 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 12 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 11.2 | 7.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Opel Calibra petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Calibra is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Calibra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Opel Calibra has 20 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. This could mean that the Opel Calibra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Calibra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Opel Calibra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`692 | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Calibra has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |