Opel Astra 2007 vs Renault Megane 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Opel Astra is more dynamic to drive. Opel Astra engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Opel Astra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Astra consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Astra could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Astra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Opel Astra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Opel Astra is smaller. Opel Astra and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 211 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
Opel Astra has 6 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`983 | 1`899 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | below average | |
Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Astra has
|
Renault Megane has
| |