Opel Astra 2001 vs Skoda Fabia 2004

 
Opel Astra
2001 - 2003
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2006
Body: CabrioEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 101 HP75 HP
Torque: 150 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds14.1 seconds
Opel Astra is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Astra engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Opel Astra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Astra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Astra could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Astra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway800 km on highway
710 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel MerivaInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Fabia might be a better choice in this respect.
Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ...  More about Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.22 m
Width: 1.71 m1.65 m
Height: 1.39 m1.45 m
Opel Astra is larger, but lower.
Opel Astra is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Astra is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres426 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1225 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Astra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`695 kg1`610 kg
Net weight:1`275 kg1`095 kg
Load capacity:420 kg515 kg
Opel Astra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Astra, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 22001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv