Opel Astra 2018 vs Mazda 3 2016

Opel Astra
2018 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol


Power: 200 HP104 HP
Torque: 300 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds13.5 seconds
Opel Astra is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Astra engine produces 96 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 156 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Opel Astra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.3
Fuel tank capacity: 48 litres51 litres


Length: 4.37 m4.58 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.49 m1.45 m
Opel Astra is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Astra is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres408 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1210 litresno data
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Opel Astra has 38 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`835
Safety: no datano data

Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 920013 600
Pros and Cons: Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv