Opel Astra 2001 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 - 190 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 280 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 8.9 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
|
Opel Astra petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Opel Astra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Opel Astra is smaller. Opel Astra is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Astra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Opel Astra has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`764 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Astra has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |