Opel Astra 2015 vs Mazda 3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Astra
2015 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 105 - 330 HP100 - 184 HP
Torque: 170 - 440 NM144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 12.7 seconds8 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.7 - 6.13.8 - 8.1
Opel Astra petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Opel Astra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 80 - 150 mm (3.1 - 5.9 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.79 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Opel Astra is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Astra is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1210 litresno data
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Opel Astra has 49 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`843~ 1`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 900013 400
Pros and Cons: Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv