Nissan Primera 1999 vs BMW X3 2005

 
Nissan Primera
1999 - 2002
BMW X3
2005 - 2006
Body: HatchbackCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 114 HP150 HP
Torque: 158 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds12 seconds
Nissan Primera engine produces 36 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 42 NM less than BMW X3. Despite less power, Nissan Primera reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.49.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The Nissan Primera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan Primera consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Nissan Primera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Primera consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway940 km on highway
730 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Nissan Primera gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Almera Tino, Nissan SentraInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW Z4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW X3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.56 m
Width: 1.72 m1.85 m
Height: 1.41 m1.67 m
Nissan Primera is smaller.
Nissan Primera is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Primera is 26 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litres1560 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Primera has 25 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 360 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Primera is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Nissan Primera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7402`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:BMW X3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Primera has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6004800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Primera has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv