Nissan Juke 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 83 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.5 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 179 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 483 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |