Nissan Juke 2010 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 50 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`926 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |