Nissan Juke 2010 vs Suzuki SX4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 70 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 270 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 19 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |