Nissan Juke 2010 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 70 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 360 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 109 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`666 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Peugeot 2008 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Peugeot 2008, so Peugeot 2008 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |