Nissan Juke 2010 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 108 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1194 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 99 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Peugeot 2008 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Peugeot 2008, so Peugeot 2008 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |