Nissan Juke 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 80 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Qashqai engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 159 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |