Nissan Juke 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.1 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 168 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |