Nissan Juke 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 50 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.0 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 19 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 644 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 393 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |