Nissan Juke 2010 vs Ford EcoSport 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 68 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.9 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 2.06 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 82 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford EcoSport scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |