Nissan Juke 2010 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 108 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Citroen C4 Cactus. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Cactus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 107 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Cactus, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |