Nissan Juke 2010 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Juke) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chevrolet Trax) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 60 HP more power than Chevrolet Trax, but torque is 60 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Trax gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 356 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 105 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`888 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |