Nissan Juke 2010 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 50 HP more power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Chevrolet Trax. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Trax gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Trax engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 356 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 105 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |