Nissan Juke 2010 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke and Suzuki SX4 have the same engine power, but Nissan Juke torque is 1 NM more than Suzuki SX4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 17 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 179 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |