Nissan Juke 2010 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 3 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 1 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 126 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`726 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Renault Captur has
| |