Nissan Juke 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 18 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix35 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 28 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 340 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 606 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |