Nissan Juke 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 21 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Hyundai ix35. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Cube | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 28 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 340 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |