Nissan Juke 2014 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 97 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 1 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 710 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 168 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |