Nissan Juke 2014 vs Suzuki SX4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 94 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.2 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki SX4, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
786 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`394 kg | 1`200 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 476 kg | 450 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 295 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |