Nissan Juke 2014 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 92 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.8 | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Yeti engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 198 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Juke, so Skoda Yeti quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |