Nissan Juke 2014 vs Seat Arona 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 99 HP more power than Seat Arona, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Seat Arona. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.0 | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Seat Arona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 3 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 193 litres less trunk space than the Seat Arona. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 494 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Arona. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Seat Arona has
| |