Nissan Juke 2014 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 124 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 170 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`671 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Renault Captur has
| |