Nissan Juke 2014 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Juke) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 2008) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 114 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 4 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 3.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 143 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |