Nissan Juke 2014 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 132 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1194 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 143 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 408 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |