Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 124 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 3.6 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is larger. Nissan Juke is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Note, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 118 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Juke has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Note, so Nissan Juke quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Note has
| |