Nissan Juke 2014 vs Mini Countryman 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 92 HP more power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mini Countryman. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Mini Cooper | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 7 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1170 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 143 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 384 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`805 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |