Nissan Juke 2014 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 214 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 94 HP more power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Hyundai Kona. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.3 | |
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Hyundai Kona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.17 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.55 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke and Hyundai Kona are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 361 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1143 litres | |
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 154 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 357 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9000 | 15 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |