Nissan Juke 2014 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 132 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Citroen C4 Cactus. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 4.6 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Cactus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is larger. Nissan Juke and Citroen C4 Cactus are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
786 litres | 1170 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 151 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Cactus (by 384 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Cactus has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |