Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke 2014 is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke 2014 engine produces 101 HP more power than Nissan Juke 2010, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Nissan Juke 2010. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke 2014 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke 2014 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke 2014 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke 2014 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Juke 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke 2014 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Juke 2010, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke 2014 has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke 2014 has 103 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke 2010. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke 2014 (by 359 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 6000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |