Nissan Juke 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 29 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 44 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 362 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |