Nissan Juke 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke 2014 engine produces 73 HP less power than Nissan Juke 2010, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Nissan Juke 2010. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke 2014 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke 2014 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke 2014 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke 2010, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke 2014 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke 2014 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Juke 2014 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke 2014 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke 2014 and Nissan Juke 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
797 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Juke 2010 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke 2014 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 6600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |