Nissan Juke 2014 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 3 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Hyundai Kona. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Juke engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Kona, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
797 litres | 1143 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 146 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 346 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |