Nissan Juke 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 44 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.7 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 44 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
797 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 223 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 908 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |