Nissan Juke 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine Toyota RAV4 2012 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota RAV4 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 44 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 223 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |